Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Y24-190-3 Use API v2 TagLayout #1901

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

sdjmchattie
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #1818

Changes proposed in this pull request

  • Use new endpoint for TagLayout.
  • Use the custom method for TagLayoutTemplate to create a TagLayout.

Instructions for Reviewers

[All PRs] - Confirm PR template filled
[Feature Branches] - Review code

@sdjmchattie sdjmchattie self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
@sdjmchattie sdjmchattie marked this pull request as draft September 6, 2024 15:20
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.97%. Comparing base (630bf1e) to head (4bad88c).
Report is 67 commits behind head on develop-Y24-190.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-Y24-190    #1901   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            77.97%   77.97%           
================================================
  Files                  459      460    +1     
  Lines                17685    17686    +1     
  Branches               229      229           
================================================
+ Hits                 13789    13790    +1     
  Misses                3894     3894           
  Partials                 2        2           
Flag Coverage Δ
javascript 69.72% <100.00%> (ø)
pull_request 77.97% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
push 77.97% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
ruby 91.12% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@BenTopping BenTopping left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks sensible.

.pryrc Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -232,17 +233,18 @@ def expect_state_change_creation
let(:tag_plate_state) { 'exhausted' }

it 'creates a tagged plate' do
# This one will be VERY different
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Intentional comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well it came from removed line 241 below and I'm making the same expectation, just via API V2, so hopefully it's intentional.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah just not sure what the difference is that the comment is suggesting.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know. I didn't want to try to clean up existing comments and I assumed it was made for a reason. It's very easy to put in comments that aren't useful in the future 😄

Base automatically changed from develop-Y24-190 to develop September 19, 2024 09:57
@sdjmchattie sdjmchattie changed the base branch from develop to develop-Y24-190 September 19, 2024 10:23
@sdjmchattie sdjmchattie merged commit 9d6a22f into develop-Y24-190 Sep 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@sdjmchattie sdjmchattie deleted the Y24-190-3-use-api-v2-tag-layout branch September 19, 2024 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants